Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: commons.wikimedia.org
Source: pesolillo.ch
Source: Horst Lüdicke
Ce 6/8II 14251 - 14283 "Crocodile"
Also known as:
Fc 2x3/4Krokodil
Vehicle type:
Registration country:
Era:
II - IV
Built by:
Gauge:
Standard gauge (1'435 mm)
Wheel arrangement:
(1′C)C1′
Electric systems:
15 kV AC / 16,7 Hz
Current collectors:
Pantograph - Symmetrical
Length over buffers (mm):
19'400 mm*
*rod buffers
19'400 mm*
*sleeve buffers
*rod buffers
19'400 mm*
*sleeve buffers
Service weight (t):
128 t
Power output (x'xxx kW / x'xxx hp):
1'000 kW
Driving wheel diameter (x'xxx,xx | mm | new / worn):
1'350 mm
Leading wheel diameter (x'xxx,xx | mm | new / worn):
950 mm
Maximum speed (km/h):
65 km/h
1900
At the beginning of the 20th century, Switzerland faced a
structural railway problem: its most important north–south axis,
the Gotthard Line, imposed extreme demands on traction. Long
gradients of up to 26‰, tight curves, tunnels and harsh alpine
weather made steam traction costly, slow and operationally
complex.
During the First World War, coal shortages further exposed Switzerland’s dependence on imported fuel. At the same time, the country possessed abundant hydroelectric resources. These combined factors accelerated the strategic decision of the Swiss Federal Railways to electrify its main lines.
By 1916, SBB had already gained experience with electric traction on secondary lines and lighter locomotives. However, no existing design was capable of reliably hauling very heavy freight trains over the Gotthard route under all conditions. A new type of locomotive was required, designed from the outset for mountain freight service.
During the First World War, coal shortages further exposed Switzerland’s dependence on imported fuel. At the same time, the country possessed abundant hydroelectric resources. These combined factors accelerated the strategic decision of the Swiss Federal Railways to electrify its main lines.
By 1916, SBB had already gained experience with electric traction on secondary lines and lighter locomotives. However, no existing design was capable of reliably hauling very heavy freight trains over the Gotthard route under all conditions. A new type of locomotive was required, designed from the outset for mountain freight service.
1917
June 30
When the Swiss Federal Railways issued its
tender on 30 June 1917, it was not seeking an incremental
improvement over existing electric locomotives. The specifications
clearly reflected the operational realities of the Gotthard Line
and the limitations observed in earlier traction experiments.
One decisive element of the tender was curve negotiability. The Gotthard route imposed tight curve radii that made long rigid-frame locomotives unsuitable. Engineers therefore converged on an articulated design, a concept already proven in steam locomotives but still uncommon in heavy electric traction.
SBB awarded the mechanical construction to Swiss Locomotive and Machine Works (SLM), whose experience with articulated steam locomotives was considered essential. The complete electrical equipment—including traction motors, transformer, control systems and braking equipment—was assigned to Maschinenfabrik Oerlikon (MFO), one of the leading European specialists in AC traction.
The resulting design was not intended as an experimental prototype, but as a standardised production locomotive capable of immediate operational deployment.
One decisive element of the tender was curve negotiability. The Gotthard route imposed tight curve radii that made long rigid-frame locomotives unsuitable. Engineers therefore converged on an articulated design, a concept already proven in steam locomotives but still uncommon in heavy electric traction.
SBB awarded the mechanical construction to Swiss Locomotive and Machine Works (SLM), whose experience with articulated steam locomotives was considered essential. The complete electrical equipment—including traction motors, transformer, control systems and braking equipment—was assigned to Maschinenfabrik Oerlikon (MFO), one of the leading European specialists in AC traction.
The resulting design was not intended as an experimental prototype, but as a standardised production locomotive capable of immediate operational deployment.
1919
The Ce 6/8II was conceived as a
carefully balanced compromise between mechanical flexibility and
electrical robustness, reflecting the specific operational demands
of heavy freight service on alpine routes. Its designers sought to
combine high adhesive weight and tractive effort with the ability
to negotiate tight curves and uneven track conditions without
excessive mechanical stress.
Structurally, the locomotive consisted of three permanently connected sections. At each end were long, narrow driving units, while the central section housed the driver’s cab, the main transformer and auxiliary electrical equipment. These sections were linked by articulated joints, allowing lateral movement between them. This articulation significantly reduced flange wear and track stress on curved alignments while preserving a high proportion of the locomotive’s weight on the driving axles, an essential factor for adhesion on steep gradients.
Each driving unit rested on three coupled driving axles, preceded by a single leading axle that improved guidance and stability. Traction was provided by one large electric motor per driving unit. Power transmission followed principles well established in steam locomotive practice: torque was transferred from the motor to a jackshaft and then distributed to the coupled axles via side rods. Although this arrangement already appeared conservative by contemporary standards, it offered clear advantages in terms of even torque distribution, mechanical durability and ease of maintenance under continuous heavy loads. The choice of this system was therefore deliberate and rooted in operational reliability rather than technological novelty.
Electrically, the Ce 6/8II was designed for the Swiss standard 15 kV 16⅔ Hz alternating current system. A large oil-cooled transformer, mounted in the central section, supplied power to the traction motors via tap changers. The control equipment was engineered to permit smooth and gradual power application, a crucial feature for preventing wheel slip when starting heavy trains on steep inclines.
Particular attention was paid to downhill operation. The inclusion of electric braking allowed the locomotive to dissipate energy or return it to the overhead line, significantly reducing dependence on mechanical brakes. This capability was indispensable for safe and controlled operation on long descents such as those encountered on the Gotthard Line, where braking performance was as critical as traction.
Between 1919 and 1922, a total of thirty-three locomotives were built and delivered, receiving the numbers Ce 6/8II 14251 - 142831. They entered service progressively as electrified sections of the Gotthard route became available2. From the outset, their deployment focused almost exclusively on freight services, where their high tractive effort and robust construction could be fully exploited without the operational constraints imposed by passenger timetables.
From the earliest months of operation, operating crews and maintenance personnel observed that the new locomotives displayed exceptional adhesive performance, stable running characteristics at low and medium speeds and a high degree of mechanical resilience under continuous load. The elongated driving hoods, combined with the visible articulation between the sections, gave the Ce 6/8II a distinctive appearance unlike that of any other locomotive in service. It was within this professional railway environment that the nickname "Krokodil" emerged, a designation that would soon extend beyond Switzerland and become permanently associated with the class.
1The first three Gotthard freight locomotives of the Ce 6/8II type were initially given the numbers 12251 - 12253, but after the delivery of the fourth locomotive they were renumbered to 14251 - 14253.
2Because at the time the first Ce 6/8II was delivered the Gotthard line had yet been electrified, the new electric locomotive was initially placed into service in Bern. From there, the locomotive could also be used by the SBB on other routes. Shortly afterwards, it was also employed on passenger trains. Only on 29 May 1921 was the entire Gotthard line between Erstfeld and Bellinzona able to be operated by electric trains. Nevertheless, the subsequent new Ce 6/8II were also commissioned in Bern, as the locomotive crews there had in the meantime become well acquainted with the particular characteristics of the articulated locomotive.
Structurally, the locomotive consisted of three permanently connected sections. At each end were long, narrow driving units, while the central section housed the driver’s cab, the main transformer and auxiliary electrical equipment. These sections were linked by articulated joints, allowing lateral movement between them. This articulation significantly reduced flange wear and track stress on curved alignments while preserving a high proportion of the locomotive’s weight on the driving axles, an essential factor for adhesion on steep gradients.
Each driving unit rested on three coupled driving axles, preceded by a single leading axle that improved guidance and stability. Traction was provided by one large electric motor per driving unit. Power transmission followed principles well established in steam locomotive practice: torque was transferred from the motor to a jackshaft and then distributed to the coupled axles via side rods. Although this arrangement already appeared conservative by contemporary standards, it offered clear advantages in terms of even torque distribution, mechanical durability and ease of maintenance under continuous heavy loads. The choice of this system was therefore deliberate and rooted in operational reliability rather than technological novelty.
Electrically, the Ce 6/8II was designed for the Swiss standard 15 kV 16⅔ Hz alternating current system. A large oil-cooled transformer, mounted in the central section, supplied power to the traction motors via tap changers. The control equipment was engineered to permit smooth and gradual power application, a crucial feature for preventing wheel slip when starting heavy trains on steep inclines.
Particular attention was paid to downhill operation. The inclusion of electric braking allowed the locomotive to dissipate energy or return it to the overhead line, significantly reducing dependence on mechanical brakes. This capability was indispensable for safe and controlled operation on long descents such as those encountered on the Gotthard Line, where braking performance was as critical as traction.
Between 1919 and 1922, a total of thirty-three locomotives were built and delivered, receiving the numbers Ce 6/8II 14251 - 142831. They entered service progressively as electrified sections of the Gotthard route became available2. From the outset, their deployment focused almost exclusively on freight services, where their high tractive effort and robust construction could be fully exploited without the operational constraints imposed by passenger timetables.
From the earliest months of operation, operating crews and maintenance personnel observed that the new locomotives displayed exceptional adhesive performance, stable running characteristics at low and medium speeds and a high degree of mechanical resilience under continuous load. The elongated driving hoods, combined with the visible articulation between the sections, gave the Ce 6/8II a distinctive appearance unlike that of any other locomotive in service. It was within this professional railway environment that the nickname "Krokodil" emerged, a designation that would soon extend beyond Switzerland and become permanently associated with the class.
1The first three Gotthard freight locomotives of the Ce 6/8II type were initially given the numbers 12251 - 12253, but after the delivery of the fourth locomotive they were renumbered to 14251 - 14253.
2Because at the time the first Ce 6/8II was delivered the Gotthard line had yet been electrified, the new electric locomotive was initially placed into service in Bern. From there, the locomotive could also be used by the SBB on other routes. Shortly afterwards, it was also employed on passenger trains. Only on 29 May 1921 was the entire Gotthard line between Erstfeld and Bellinzona able to be operated by electric trains. Nevertheless, the subsequent new Ce 6/8II were also commissioned in Bern, as the locomotive crews there had in the meantime become well acquainted with the particular characteristics of the articulated locomotive.
1920s
With the completion of the electrification of the Gotthard Line in
the early 1920s, the Ce 6/8II entered
the phase for which it had been specifically conceived. It rapidly
became the principal electric freight locomotive on this
strategically vital route, taking over duties that had previously
required large numbers of steam locomotives and complex operating
procedures. The new electric traction offered a level of
consistency and controllability that fundamentally changed daily
operations on the alpine line.
In regular service, the Ce 6/8II demonstrated a strong capacity for sustained heavy haulage on long gradients. Its articulated structure allowed it to negotiate tight curves with reduced mechanical stress, while the distribution of adhesive weight ensured stable running even at low speeds under high drawbar loads. The relatively modest top speed of the locomotive was well suited to the operational realities of Gotthard freight traffic, where reliability and controlled downhill operation were far more important than velocity. The integrated electric braking system proved particularly valuable on long descents, reducing reliance on mechanical brakes and improving overall operational safety.
As the class accumulated operating mileage, it transitioned from a newly introduced design into a fully standardised element of the Swiss Federal Railways fleet. Maintenance routines became increasingly systematic, and operating crews developed a high level of familiarity with the locomotive’s handling characteristics. By the mid-1920s, the Ce 6/8II was no longer treated as a special-purpose machine but as a routine assignment within freight diagrams, reflecting its successful integration into everyday railway operations.
During the later 1920s and throughout the 1930s, the gradual expansion of electrification across Switzerland led to a broader deployment of the class. While the Gotthard line remained its primary domain, Ce 6/8II locomotives were increasingly used on other routes requiring high tractive effort, including additional alpine sections and major freight corridors linking industrial regions. This wider use confirmed that the locomotive was not limited to a single line or operating niche but was capable of reliable service across a variety of operating environments.
In regular service, the Ce 6/8II demonstrated a strong capacity for sustained heavy haulage on long gradients. Its articulated structure allowed it to negotiate tight curves with reduced mechanical stress, while the distribution of adhesive weight ensured stable running even at low speeds under high drawbar loads. The relatively modest top speed of the locomotive was well suited to the operational realities of Gotthard freight traffic, where reliability and controlled downhill operation were far more important than velocity. The integrated electric braking system proved particularly valuable on long descents, reducing reliance on mechanical brakes and improving overall operational safety.
As the class accumulated operating mileage, it transitioned from a newly introduced design into a fully standardised element of the Swiss Federal Railways fleet. Maintenance routines became increasingly systematic, and operating crews developed a high level of familiarity with the locomotive’s handling characteristics. By the mid-1920s, the Ce 6/8II was no longer treated as a special-purpose machine but as a routine assignment within freight diagrams, reflecting its successful integration into everyday railway operations.
During the later 1920s and throughout the 1930s, the gradual expansion of electrification across Switzerland led to a broader deployment of the class. While the Gotthard line remained its primary domain, Ce 6/8II locomotives were increasingly used on other routes requiring high tractive effort, including additional alpine sections and major freight corridors linking industrial regions. This wider use confirmed that the locomotive was not limited to a single line or operating niche but was capable of reliable service across a variety of operating environments.
1930s
The arrival of newer electric locomotive designs during the 1930s
did not immediately diminish the role of the Ce
6/8II. Instead, it retained a clearly defined
position within the fleet as the preferred locomotive for the
heaviest freight duties. Its proven mechanical durability and
predictable behaviour under load made it a reference point against
which newer designs were assessed. By the end of the decade, the
Ce 6/8II had become firmly established
not only as a technical success but also as a symbol of Swiss
electric railway engineering, its distinctive articulated form and
long association with the Gotthard line earning it enduring
recognition both within the railway community and beyond.
1942
Between 1942 and 1947, 13 Ce 6/8II
locomotives underwent technical modifications that primarily
concerned the electrical equipment. Improved traction motors and
revised control systems allowed a higher continuous output and
permitted an increase in the maximum speed from 65 km/h to 75 km/h.
The new traction motors and the lengthening of the bumper beams
reduced the weight and the metre load of the locomotives, which
meant that they could also be used on branch lines.
Following these changes, the rebuilt locomotives were reclassified as Be 6/8II in accordance with the Swiss locomotive classification system. In outward appearance, however, the modernized locomotives remained largely unchanged.
Following these changes, the rebuilt locomotives were reclassified as Be 6/8II in accordance with the Swiss locomotive classification system. In outward appearance, however, the modernized locomotives remained largely unchanged.
1950s
As the post-war decades progressed, the original Ce
6/8II locomotives increasingly operated
alongside both their modernised Be 6/8II counterparts and newer
generations of Swiss electric locomotives. While the Crocodiles had
once represented the highest level of electric freight traction
available, developments in locomotive design during the 1950s
gradually shifted operational priorities. Newer classes offered
higher power, greater speeds and more compact layouts, making them
better suited to the growing demands of mainline freight
traffic.
Within the Swiss Federal Railways fleet, this evolution led to a progressive reallocation of duties. The non-modernised Ce 6/8II units were increasingly removed from front-line Gotthard service and reassigned to tasks where their limitations were of lesser importance. These included transfer freight movements, local freight services and heavy shunting duties in major marshalling yards. In such roles, their strong tractive effort at low speeds and their well-understood mechanical behaviour continued to be valuable assets.
Despite their advancing age, the Ce 6/8II locomotives remained operationally reliable. Their conservative mechanical design, derived in part from established steam-era practices, proved resilient under prolonged use.
Within the Swiss Federal Railways fleet, this evolution led to a progressive reallocation of duties. The non-modernised Ce 6/8II units were increasingly removed from front-line Gotthard service and reassigned to tasks where their limitations were of lesser importance. These included transfer freight movements, local freight services and heavy shunting duties in major marshalling yards. In such roles, their strong tractive effort at low speeds and their well-understood mechanical behaviour continued to be valuable assets.
Despite their advancing age, the Ce 6/8II locomotives remained operationally reliable. Their conservative mechanical design, derived in part from established steam-era practices, proved resilient under prolonged use.
1965
The first of the original Ce 6/8II to
be retired was from 1965 on.
At the same time 11 units began to be converted for use at large switch yards, whereby the following changes were done: installation of switching radio, removal of one pantograph, and installation of new platform railings in front of the hoods.
At the same time 11 units began to be converted for use at large switch yards, whereby the following changes were done: installation of switching radio, removal of one pantograph, and installation of new platform railings in front of the hoods.
1970s & 1980s
By the late 1970s and early 1980s, the remaining Ce
6/8II locomotives were confined almost
exclusively to secondary duties. Their role within the network had
become marginal, yet their continued presence illustrated the
exceptional longevity of the design. The final withdrawals took
place in 1986, marking the end of regular service for the original
Ce 6/8II configuration nearly seventy
years after the class had first been conceived.
Following their withdrawal, the historical significance of the Ce 6/8II was widely recognised. Seven locomotives were preserved by museums and railway heritage organisations, while others were retained as monuments or for static display.
Today, the Ce 6/8II stands as a foundational chapter in the history of Swiss electric traction, embodying both the early ambitions of railway electrification and the durability of a design shaped by the demanding conditions of alpine freight operation.
Following their withdrawal, the historical significance of the Ce 6/8II was widely recognised. Seven locomotives were preserved by museums and railway heritage organisations, while others were retained as monuments or for static display.
Today, the Ce 6/8II stands as a foundational chapter in the history of Swiss electric traction, embodying both the early ambitions of railway electrification and the durability of a design shaped by the demanding conditions of alpine freight operation.
Do you have additional informations regarding this vehicle?
Help us writing the history of Ce 6/8II 14251 - 14283 "Crocodile"! Your knowledge is precious for us and the entire community, do not hesitate to share your facts, photos or videos:
Latest update on the 3rd of January 2026 at 09:54
Contributor(s): Tudor C.
Advertising:
Ce 6/8II 14251 - 14283 (Crocodile) - Related videos:
Ce 6/8II 14251 - 14283 "Crocodile" - Associated miniature models:
SBB CFF FFS - Ce 6/8II "Crocodile" electric locomotive
Manufacturer: Märklin
Article number: 39595
Available since: 1st Quarter 2022
SBB CFF FFS - Crocodile replica
Manufacturer: Märklin
Article number: 10920
Expected availability: 2026
Class Ce 6/8 II "Crocodile" Electric Locomotive
Manufacturer: Märklin
Article number: 39567
Announced: N/A
Discussion forum
Advertising:
The identity card, photos and videos for thousands of railway vehicles all around Europe!
Copyright © 2026 T&H Services - All rights reserved
Powered by
